Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Number of tests

21

3

1

3

2

Best position

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

11.9

3.7

1.0

3.3

1.0

Latest test

2024

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

164

34

64

40

23

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

1%

Wet side guide

Firestone Roadhawk

92%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

100%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

63%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT

Roadhawk

e.Ziex

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison