18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
21
2
3
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
11.9
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
164
23
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
73%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison