18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental PremiumContact 6 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Today, we're analysing two summer tyres from well-known manufacturers: the Firestone Roadhawk and the Continental PremiumContact 6. Both tyres have been subjected to a variety of tests to determine their performance and functionality under different conditions.

The Firestone Roadhawk, produced by Firestone, secured a decent 72% rating from our team. In the ADAC test, it was in the 17th position, while in the autobild test it achieved the 13th rank out of 53. These rankings suggest that the tyre performs reasonably well, but still has room for improvement. Special mention should be given to its dry handling and wet-handling capabilities, which were highlighted as its best features.


In spite of these strengths, test summaries suggested that the Firestone Roadhawk had some weaknesses on wet surfaces, raising concerns over its ability to maintain control in such conditions. Furthermore, longer durability was also mentioned as an aspect needing improvement. On the upside, the tyre received commendation for low fuel consumption and efficient load handling.


On the other hand, the Continental PremiumContact 6, brought to market by Continental, enjoyed a higher rating of 87% from our team. This tyre has since been replaced by the Continental PremiumContact 7.


In comparison with the Firestone Roadhawk, the Continental PremiumContact 6 fared better in tests, securing the 2nd position in the ADAC test, and 8th in autobild. It notably outshines its competitor in terms of wet braking, a feature that is crucial for maintaining control during unexpected rainfall. It also excelled in both dry handling and mileage.


In the autozeitung test, it even secured the 1st position. The plus points noted in its test summary include high driving safety, good performance on both dry and wet surfaces, and low fuel consumption. The tyre was also praised for having no significant weaknesses.


In conclusion, while the Firestone Roadhawk is a solid option, our recommendation would lean towards the Continental PremiumContact 6 for its brilliant all-round performance, superb wet handling, and durability. This being said, it's always important to consider individual driving habits and requirements before making a final choice.

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
PremiumContact 6
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
21
36
10
Best position
#2
#1
#2
Average position
11.9
3.1
6.0
Latest test
2024
2023
2026
Available sizes
164
296
104

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
84%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
87%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
Continental PremiumContact 6
74%
Wet performance
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental PremiumContact 6
90%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental PremiumContact 6
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
85%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Dry performance
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental PremiumContact 6
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%
Dry steering response
Firestone Roadhawk
100%
Continental PremiumContact 6
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental PremiumContact 6
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental PremiumContact 6
100%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental PremiumContact 6
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental PremiumContact 6
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental PremiumContact 6
85%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental PremiumContact 6
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
70%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental PremiumContact 6
81%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
97%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental PremiumContact 6
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

OrganizationSeasonYearDimension
ADACADAC
Summer
2023205/55 R16View

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison