Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk

EcoContact 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

21

5

3

1

14

Best position

#2

#7

#2

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

13.0

3.3

1.0

5.5

Latest test

2024

2022

2026

2025

Available sizes

164

676

40

64

706

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Dry driving behavior

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Interior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Continental EcoContact 6

71%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

28%

Fuel efficiency

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

99%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Roadhawk

EcoContact 6

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison