Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

Roadhawk

EcoContact 6

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Number of tests

21

5

3

Best position

#2

#7

#1

#2

Average position

11.9

13.0

2.2

3.3

3.7

Latest test

2024

2022

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

164

676

63

40

34

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental EcoContact 6

60%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Continental EcoContact 6

40%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk

79%

Continental EcoContact 6

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

57%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk

67%

Continental EcoContact 6

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk

85%

Continental EcoContact 6

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk

83%

Continental EcoContact 6

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk

88%

Continental EcoContact 6

70%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry driving behavior

Firestone Roadhawk

75%

Continental EcoContact 6

73%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

65%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

71%

Continental EcoContact 6

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

62%

Continental EcoContact 6

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Interior noise

Firestone Roadhawk

77%

Continental EcoContact 6

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

100%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

73%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk

70%

Continental EcoContact 6

93%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk

64%

Continental EcoContact 6

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk

74%

Continental EcoContact 6

100%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk

61%

Continental EcoContact 6

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Fuel efficiency

Firestone Roadhawk

78%

Continental EcoContact 6

99%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk

EcoContact 6

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison