18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk vs. Continental EcoContact 6 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk
Continental
EcoContact 6
BFGoodrich
Advantage
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
21
5
14
3
3
Best position
#2
#7
#8
#2
#2
Average position
11.9
13.0
13.4
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2024
2022
2026
2026
2025
Available sizes
164
676
153
40
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental EcoContact 6
60%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
Continental EcoContact 6
40%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk
79%
Continental EcoContact 6
61%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk
67%
Continental EcoContact 6
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
69%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Wet side guide
Firestone Roadhawk
92%
BFGoodrich Advantage
54%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
100%
Falken e.Ziex
73%
Wet performance
Firestone Roadhawk
24%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk
85%
Continental EcoContact 6
77%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk
83%
Continental EcoContact 6
78%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk
88%
Continental EcoContact 6
70%
BFGoodrich Advantage
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Roadhawk
75%
Continental EcoContact 6
73%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
65%
Dry performance
Firestone Roadhawk
66%
Continental EcoContact 6
86%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
64%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
71%
Continental EcoContact 6
84%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
62%
Continental EcoContact 6
85%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Interior noise
Firestone Roadhawk
77%
Continental EcoContact 6
83%
BFGoodrich Advantage
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk
70%
Continental EcoContact 6
93%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk
64%
Continental EcoContact 6
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk
74%
Continental EcoContact 6
100%
BFGoodrich Advantage
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk
61%
Continental EcoContact 6
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Fuel efficiency
Firestone Roadhawk
78%
Continental EcoContact 6
99%
BFGoodrich Advantage
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
94%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison