18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
6
3
16
3
18
5
5
Best position
#3
#1
#3
#2
#1
#1
#1
Average position
4.7
4.7
5.5
3.3
6.1
2.2
2.2
Latest test
2026
2026
2023
2026
2024
2025
2025
Available sizes
146
126
153
40
47
63
63

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
93%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
86%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
77%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison