18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5 vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
6
3
18
3
3
5
1
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#2
#2
#1
#1
Average position
4.7
4.7
6.1
3.3
3.7
2.2
1.0
Latest test
2026
2026
2024
2026
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
146
126
47
40
34
63
64

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Michelin Primacy 5
76%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Hankook ION Evo
91%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
69%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Hankook ION Evo
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Falken e.Ziex
95%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
77%
Hankook ION Evo
69%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison