Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

9.8

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk 2

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

6

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

4.7

4.0

3.3

Latest test

2026

Available sizes

146

54

60

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk 2

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison