Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk 2

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

4.7

4.0

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

146

54

34

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

62%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

73%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

69%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

52%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72)

76%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta Sport (PS72) vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Ecsta Sport (PS72)

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison