Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Also compare with

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

6

1

3

33

5

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.7

1.0

3.3

4.1

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

146

64

40

658

63

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Wet performance

Firestone Roadhawk 2

70%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

82%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Dry lane changing

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

84%

Dry performance

Firestone Roadhawk 2

58%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

64%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

83%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

93%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Hankook ION Evo

60%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

53%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

76%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

81%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Bridgestone Turanza T005

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Bridgestone Turanza T005 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

Turanza T005

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison