Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

CrossClimate 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

6

3

1

3

24

5

Best position

#3

#2

#1

#2

#1

Average position

4.7

3.3

1.0

3.7

2.7

2.2

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

146

40

27

34

151

63

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

79%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

90%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

78%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

84%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION FlexClimate

84%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

43%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

87%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Michelin CrossClimate 2

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION FlexClimate vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION FlexClimate

e.Ziex

CrossClimate 2

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison