Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

P ZERO PZ4

e.Ziex

Number of tests

6

3

1

5

14

3

Best position

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

4.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

5.5

3.7

Latest test

2026

2025

Available sizes

146

40

64

63

706

34

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Dry lane changing

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Hankook ION Evo

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

59%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Roadhawk 2

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

P ZERO PZ4

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison