Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Upper-middle

Firestone

Roadhawk 2

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

Pilot Sport 4 S

Test Profile

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Ventus Evo

Number of tests

6

3

26

3

Best position

#3

#2

#1

#2

Average position

4.7

3.7

3.3

2.2

3.3

Latest test

2026

2025

2026

Available sizes

146

34

40

66

60

Wet

Firestone Roadhawk 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Wet handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Roadhawk 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Roadhawk 2

95%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

81%

Wet braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Continental PremiumContact 7

94%

Hankook Ventus Evo

95%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Roadhawk 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Continental PremiumContact 7

92%

Hankook Ventus Evo

96%

Dry

Firestone Roadhawk 2

79%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

83%

Dry braking

Firestone Roadhawk 2

81%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

90%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Dry handling

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Hankook Ventus Evo

90%

Dry lane changing

Firestone Roadhawk 2

93%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Continental PremiumContact 7

85%

Costs

Firestone Roadhawk 2

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

80%

Rolling resistance

Firestone Roadhawk 2

85%

Falken e.Ziex

95%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

72%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

86%

Price/value

Firestone Roadhawk 2

60%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Continental PremiumContact 7

77%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Mileage

Firestone Roadhawk 2

38%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Continental PremiumContact 7

81%

Hankook Ventus Evo

71%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Continental PremiumContact 7

76%

Hankook Ventus Evo

75%

Comfort

Firestone Roadhawk 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Continental PremiumContact 7

75%

Hankook Ventus Evo

76%

Exterior noise

Firestone Roadhawk 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Continental PremiumContact 7

69%

Hankook Ventus Evo

73%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Roadhawk 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

PremiumContact 7

Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison