18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Dunlop Winter vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Dunlop
Winter
Continental
WinterContact TS 870
Number of tests
6
2
17
Best position
#3
#1
#1
Average position
4.7
1.5
1.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
146
65
80

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Dunlop Winter
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
87%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
67%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
93%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Dunlop Winter
63%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
94%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Dunlop Winter
69%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Dunlop Winter
73%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
64%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
91%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
90%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
80%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
86%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Dunlop Winter
83%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
84%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Dunlop Winter
81%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
89%
Price/value
Firestone Roadhawk 2
60%
Dunlop Winter
84%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
68%
Mileage
Firestone Roadhawk 2
38%
Dunlop Winter
87%
Continental WinterContact TS 870
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison