18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Roadhawk 2 vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Roadhawk 2
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
6
2
3
Best position
#3
#1
#2
Average position
4.7
1.0
3.7
Latest test
2026
2025
2025
Available sizes
146
23
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Roadhawk 2
86%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Roadhawk 2
88%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Roadhawk 2
95%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Roadhawk 2
84%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Roadhawk 2
79%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry braking
Firestone Roadhawk 2
81%
Continental UltraContact NXT
63%
Falken e.Ziex
88%
Dry handling
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
81%
Dry lane changing
Firestone Roadhawk 2
93%
Continental UltraContact NXT
100%
Falken e.Ziex
87%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Roadhawk 2
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Rolling resistance
Firestone Roadhawk 2
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
95%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Comfort
Firestone Roadhawk 2
71%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Roadhawk 2
66%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison