18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
15
1
5
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#1
Average position
3.0
9.0
1.0
2.2
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
35
225
64
63

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison