Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Destination HP

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

15

1

Best position

#3

#2

#1

Average position

3.0

9.0

1.0

Latest test

2017

2025

Available sizes

35

225

64

Wet

Firestone Destination HP

74%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet braking

Firestone Destination HP

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Destination HP

64%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Destination HP

78%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Wet handling

Firestone Destination HP

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Costs

Firestone Destination HP

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Firestone Destination HP

60%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Comfort

Firestone Destination HP

73%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Firestone Destination HP

62%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Dry

Firestone Destination HP

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry driving behavior

Firestone Destination HP

97%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Destination HP

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison