18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Firestone Destination HPUpper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20
Kumho Ecsta PS71Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta PS71

8.3
R16 – R22
Falken e.ZiexUpper-middle
FalkenFalken

e.Ziex

9.0
R15 – R21
Also compare with
SportContact 7 Ventus Evo PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
15
3
Best position
#3
#2
#2
Average position
3.0
9.0
3.7
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
Available sizes
35
225
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Falken e.Ziex
68%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Dry driving behavior
Firestone Destination HP
97%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison