18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52 vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Firestone Destination HPUpper-middle
FirestoneFirestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20
Kumho Ecsta HS52Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

Ecsta HS52

7.4
R14 – R20
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUVPremium
GoodyearGoodyear

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

9.2
R16 – R22
Also compare with
PremiumContact 7 Cinturato (C3) Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
10
5
Best position
#3
#2
#1
Average position
3.0
6.0
2.2
Latest test
2017
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
104
63

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison