18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Hankook
ION Evo
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Number of tests
1
1
18
15
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.0
1.0
6.1
9.0
Latest test
2017
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
35
64
47
225

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Hankook ION Evo
82%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison