Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Premium

Hankook

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Destination HP

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

1

3

5

Best position

#3

#1

#2

#1

Average position

3.0

1.0

3.7

2.2

Latest test

2017

2025

Available sizes

35

64

34

63

Wet

Firestone Destination HP

74%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Wet braking

Firestone Destination HP

80%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Destination HP

64%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Destination HP

78%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet handling

Firestone Destination HP

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Dry

Firestone Destination HP

92%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Firestone Destination HP

67%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Comfort

Firestone Destination HP

73%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Firestone Destination HP

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Destination HP

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison