18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
3
10
Best position
#3
#2
#2
Average position
3.0
3.3
6.0
Latest test
2017
2026
2026
Available sizes
35
40
104

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Interior noise
Firestone Destination HP
81%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
73%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
71%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison