18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
1
3
3
3
Best position
#3
#2
#2
#2
Average position
3.0
3.3
3.7
3.3
Latest test
2017
2026
2025
2026
Available sizes
35
40
34
60

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison