18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Kumho
Ecsta PS71
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
5
15
1
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.0
2.2
9.0
1.0
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
35
63
225
64

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
87%
Hankook ION Evo
87%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
79%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
90%
Hankook ION Evo
77%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
67%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
62%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
72%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
71%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Kumho Ecsta PS71
65%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison