Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Premium

Goodyear

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

Destination HP

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

5

1

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

3.0

2.2

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2017

2025

Available sizes

35

63

64

34

Wet

Firestone Destination HP

74%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Wet braking

Firestone Destination HP

80%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Wet circle cornering

Firestone Destination HP

64%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Destination HP

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Firestone Destination HP

61%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Dry

Firestone Destination HP

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Costs

Firestone Destination HP

67%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Comfort

Firestone Destination HP

73%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Destination HP

62%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Falken e.Ziex

Destination HP

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

ION Evo

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Costs

Comfort

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison