18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
5
3
26
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.0
2.2
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
35
63
34
66

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison