18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV vs. Continental PremiumContact 7 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
5
26
3
Best position
#3
#1
#1
#2
Average position
3.0
2.2
2.2
3.7
Latest test
2017
2025
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
63
66
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
96%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison