18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo vs. Hankook ION Evo

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Goodyear
Efficient Grip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Hankook
ION Evo
Number of tests
1
18
3
1
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.0
6.1
3.3
1.0
Latest test
2017
2024
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
47
60
64

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Hankook ION Evo
89%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Hankook ION Evo
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Hankook ION Evo
97%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
89%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%
Hankook ION Evo
92%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
73%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Hankook ION Evo
87%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
76%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Hankook ION Evo
72%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%
Hankook ION Evo
66%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Hankook ION Evo
92%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
91%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Hankook ION Evo
71%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Goodyear Efficient Grip Performance 2
100%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Hankook ION Evo
82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison