18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. General Tire Grabber GT Plus vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
General
Tire Grabber GT Plus
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Falken
e.Ziex
Number of tests
1
2
3
3
Best position
#3
#9
#2
#2
Average position
3.0
9.0
3.3
3.7
Latest test
2017
2023
2026
2025
Available sizes
35
64
40
34

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
61%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
62%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Falken e.Ziex
61%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Falken e.Ziex
78%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
64%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
General Tire Grabber GT Plus
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Falken e.Ziex
60%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison