18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Falken
e.Ziex
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Number of tests
1
3
2
3
Best position
#3
#2
#1
#2
Average position
3.0
3.7
1.0
3.3
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2026
Available sizes
35
34
23
40

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Mileage
Firestone Destination HP
60%
Falken e.Ziex
60%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison