18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Michelin Primacy 5

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Continental
UltraContact NXT
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Michelin
Primacy 5
Number of tests
1
2
3
3
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.0
1.0
3.3
4.7
Latest test
2017
2025
2026
2026
Available sizes
35
23
40
126

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Michelin Primacy 5
58%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Michelin Primacy 5
65%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Michelin Primacy 5
51%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Michelin Primacy 5
73%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Michelin Primacy 5
63%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Michelin Primacy 5
1%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison