18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Firestone
Destination HP
Continental
UltraContact NXT
Falken
e.Ziex
Goodyear
Efficientgrip 2 SUV
Number of tests
1
2
3
5
Best position
#3
#1
#2
#1
Average position
3.0
1.0
3.7
2.2
Latest test
2017
2025
2025
2025
Available sizes
35
23
34
63

Wet

Wet
Firestone Destination HP
74%
Continental UltraContact NXT
56%
Falken e.Ziex
75%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%
Wet braking
Firestone Destination HP
80%
Continental UltraContact NXT
51%
Falken e.Ziex
87%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
85%
Wet circle cornering
Firestone Destination HP
64%
Continental UltraContact NXT
1%
Falken e.Ziex
77%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Firestone Destination HP
78%
Continental UltraContact NXT
68%
Falken e.Ziex
61%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
82%
Wet handling
Firestone Destination HP
61%
Continental UltraContact NXT
45%
Falken e.Ziex
69%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
86%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Firestone Destination HP
83%
Continental UltraContact NXT
65%
Falken e.Ziex
68%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Firestone Destination HP
73%
Continental UltraContact NXT
44%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
92%
Exterior noise
Firestone Destination HP
62%
Continental UltraContact NXT
42%
Falken e.Ziex
78%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
90%

Dry

Dry
Firestone Destination HP
92%
Continental UltraContact NXT
75%
Falken e.Ziex
85%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
83%

Costs

Costs
Firestone Destination HP
67%
Continental UltraContact NXT
88%
Falken e.Ziex
80%
Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV
84%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison