Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Upper-middle

Firestone

Destination HP

R15 – R20

VS

Premium

Continental

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

9.0

R15 – R21

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 4 SUV

Test Profile

Destination HP

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Number of tests

1

2

3

Best position

#3

#1

#2

Average position

3.0

1.0

3.7

Latest test

2017

2025

Available sizes

35

23

34

Wet

Firestone Destination HP

74%

Continental UltraContact NXT

56%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Aquaplaning - cross

Firestone Destination HP

78%

Continental UltraContact NXT

68%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Wet handling

Firestone Destination HP

61%

Continental UltraContact NXT

45%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Firestone Destination HP

83%

Continental UltraContact NXT

65%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Wet braking

Firestone Destination HP

80%

Continental UltraContact NXT

51%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Costs

Firestone Destination HP

67%

Continental UltraContact NXT

88%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Comfort

Firestone Destination HP

73%

Continental UltraContact NXT

44%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Exterior noise

Firestone Destination HP

62%

Continental UltraContact NXT

42%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Dry

Firestone Destination HP

92%

Continental UltraContact NXT

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Firestone Destination HP vs. Continental UltraContact NXT vs. Falken e.Ziex

Destination HP

UltraContact NXT

e.Ziex

Test Profile

Wet

Costs

Comfort

Dry

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison