18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken ZIEX ZE320 vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook Ventus Evo

Test Profile

Falken
ZIEX ZE320
GoodYear
Efficientgrip Performance 2
Hankook
Ventus Evo
Number of tests
5
3
3
Best position
#3
#2
#2
Average position
6.4
3.3
3.3
Latest test
2026
2026
2026
Available sizes
43
40
60

Wet

Wet
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Wet braking
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
78%
Hankook Ventus Evo
95%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken ZIEX ZE320
74%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
66%
Hankook Ventus Evo
81%
Wet handling
Falken ZIEX ZE320
98%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
74%
Hankook Ventus Evo
87%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken ZIEX ZE320
66%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
69%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%
Wet circle cornering
Falken ZIEX ZE320
73%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
61%
Hankook Ventus Evo
96%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE320
58%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
70%
Hankook Ventus Evo
75%
Comfort
Falken ZIEX ZE320
79%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
59%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Exterior noise
Falken ZIEX ZE320
82%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
67%
Hankook Ventus Evo
73%

Costs

Costs
Falken ZIEX ZE320
72%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
83%
Hankook Ventus Evo
80%
Rolling resistance
Falken ZIEX ZE320
83%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
72%
Hankook Ventus Evo
86%
Mileage
Falken ZIEX ZE320
56%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
99%
Hankook Ventus Evo
71%

Dry

Dry
Falken ZIEX ZE320
84%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
75%
Hankook Ventus Evo
83%
Dry braking
Falken ZIEX ZE320
87%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
76%
Dry handling
Falken ZIEX ZE320
80%
GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2
77%
Hankook Ventus Evo
90%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison