Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

VS

Upper-middle

Kumho

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

9.0

R17 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

EuroWinter VAN01

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

Number of tests

1

15

1

Best position

#6

#2

#1

Average position

6.0

9.0

1.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

32

225

64

Wet

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Dry driving behavior

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

80%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Ice

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71 vs. Hankook ION Evo

EuroWinter VAN01

Ecsta PS71

ION Evo

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Ice

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison