Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Hankook

ION Evo

Ecsta PS71

8.3

R16 – R22

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

EuroWinter VAN01

ION Evo

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

1

15

Best position

#6

#1

#2

Average position

6.0

1.0

9.0

Latest test

2019

2025

Available sizes

32

64

225

Wet

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

82%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry driving behavior

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

80%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Ice

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

EuroWinter VAN01

ION Evo

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison