Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

R14 – R17

Upper-middle

Kumho

PorTran CW51

R14 – R17

1 mutual test(s) with detailed data

Also compare with

Turanza T005

Test Profile

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

PorTran CW51

Number of tests

1

Best position

#6

#7

#8

Average position

6.0

7.0

8.0

Latest test

2019

Available sizes

32

56

21

Performance comparison

Wet Performance

67%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

65%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Wet Braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

Kumho PorTran CW51

49%

Wet Handling

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

Kumho PorTran CW51

46%

Wet Circle Cornering

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Aquaplaning Longitudinal

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Aquaplaning Cross

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Dry Performance

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

78%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Dry Braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Performance

49%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

79%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

70%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Snow Braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho PorTran CW51

78%

Snow Traction

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

83%

Kumho PorTran CW51

72%

Snow Handling

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

40%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

76%

Kumho PorTran CW51

60%

Ice Performance

86%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

74%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

78%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Ice Braking Abs

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Kumho PorTran CW51

81%

Ice Lateral Guidance

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Kumho PorTran CW51

74%

Comfort & Noise

81%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

56%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

71%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Noise Exterior

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Noise Interior

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

71%

Economy

89%

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

76%

Bridgestone

Blizzak W810

76%

Kumho

PorTran CW51

Fuel Efficiency

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

Kumho PorTran CW51

84%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

Kumho PorTran CW51

67%

Tests used in comparison

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
ADAC	Winter	2019	205/65 R16	View

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

View general comparison

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Kumho PorTran CW51

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

PorTran CW51

Test Profile

Performance comparison

Tests used in comparison

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison