18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. Continental PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01
Bridgestone
Blizzak W810
Continental
PremiumContact 7
Number of tests
1
1
26
Best position
#6
#7
#1
Average position
6.0
7.0
2.2
Latest test
2019
2019
2026
Available sizes
32
56
66

Wet

Wet
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
51%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Wet braking
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
40%
Continental PremiumContact 7
94%
Wet circle cornering
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
61%
Continental PremiumContact 7
92%
Wet handling
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
57%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
34%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
75%

Dry

Dry
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
82%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%
Dry braking
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%
Continental PremiumContact 7
90%

Snow

Snow
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
48%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
78%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
58%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Exterior noise
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
91%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
44%
Continental PremiumContact 7
69%
Interior noise
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
88%

Ice

Ice
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
74%

Costs

Costs
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
73%
Continental PremiumContact 7
76%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
Bridgestone Blizzak W810
67%
Continental PremiumContact 7
81%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison