Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Number of tests

1

14

15

Best position

#6

#7

#8

#2

Average position

6.0

7.0

13.4

9.0

Latest test

2019

2026

2025

Available sizes

32

56

153

225

Wet

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

90%

Wet performance

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

49%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

82%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

87%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry performance

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

72%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

76%

Dry driving behavior

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

53%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

38%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

67%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

62%

Interior noise

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

81%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

66%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

71%

Fuel efficiency

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

84%

BFGoodrich Advantage

93%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

83%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta PS71

65%

Ice

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta PS71

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

Advantage

Ecsta PS71

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison