Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter VAN01

R14 – R17

VS

Premium

Bridgestone

Also compare with

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Pilot Sport 5

Test Profile

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Number of tests

1

14

10

Best position

#6

#7

#8

#2

Average position

6.0

7.0

13.4

6.0

Latest test

2019

2026

Available sizes

32

56

153

104

Wet

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

51%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

57%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

34%

BFGoodrich Advantage

57%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

53%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

66%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

61%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Wet performance

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

49%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

55%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

40%

BFGoodrich Advantage

77%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

80%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

61%

BFGoodrich Advantage

69%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

48%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

72%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

87%

Dry performance

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

66%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

46%

BFGoodrich Advantage

70%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

72%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

78%

BFGoodrich Advantage

76%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

89%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

58%

BFGoodrich Advantage

79%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

77%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

91%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

44%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

73%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

73%

BFGoodrich Advantage

68%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

76%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

67%

BFGoodrich Advantage

63%

Kumho Ecsta HS52

79%

Ice

Falken EuroWinter VAN01

86%

Bridgestone Blizzak W810

74%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak W810 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

EuroWinter VAN01

Blizzak W810

Advantage

Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Ice

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison