18 Shops · 56,847+ Products

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter VAN01 vs. BFGoodrich Advantage vs. Kumho Ecsta HS52

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter VAN01
BFGoodrich
Advantage
Kumho
Ecsta HS52
Number of tests
1
14
10
Best position
#6
#8
#2
Average position
6.0
13.4
6.0
Latest test
2019
2026
2026
Available sizes
32
153
104

Wet

Wet
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Wet braking
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
71%
BFGoodrich Advantage
77%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
80%
Wet circle cornering
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
72%
BFGoodrich Advantage
69%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Wet handling
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
57%
BFGoodrich Advantage
57%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
53%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
66%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
67%
BFGoodrich Advantage
61%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%
Wet performance
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
64%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
55%

Dry

Dry
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
82%
BFGoodrich Advantage
72%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
87%
Dry braking
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
76%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
89%
Dry performance
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
66%
BFGoodrich Advantage
70%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
72%

Snow

Snow
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
48%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
80%
BFGoodrich Advantage
79%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
77%
Exterior noise
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
91%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
73%

Ice

Ice
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
86%

Costs

Costs
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
68%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
76%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter VAN01
89%
BFGoodrich Advantage
63%
Kumho Ecsta HS52
79%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison