Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02

WR Snowproof

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Number of tests

4

14

23

3

Best position

#7

#5

#1

#4

Average position

12.3

11.1

3.3

4.3

Latest test

2025

2023

2025

Available sizes

98

60

176

97

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Nokian WR Snowproof

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Nokian WR Snowproof

64%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

87%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Nokian WR Snowproof

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

Nokian WR Snowproof

67%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

83%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

Nokian WR Snowproof

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

Nokian WR Snowproof

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Nokian WR Snowproof

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

49%

Nokian WR Snowproof

82%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Snow traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02

56%

Nokian WR Snowproof

76%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

91%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Snow handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

32%

Nokian WR Snowproof

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Nokian WR Snowproof

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

Nokian WR Snowproof

89%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Nokian WR Snowproof

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dry lane changing

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

74%

Dry steering response

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

Nokian WR Snowproof

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

Nokian WR Snowproof

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

50%

Nokian WR Snowproof

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

80%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance+ vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

EuroWinter HS02

WR Snowproof

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison