Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

WR Snowproof

Blizzak LM-005

8.2

R14 – R22

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02

WR Snowproof

Blizzak LM-005

Number of tests

4

14

49

Best position

#7

#5

#1

Average position

12.3

11.1

3.2

Latest test

2025

2023

2024

Available sizes

98

60

213

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Nokian WR Snowproof

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Nokian WR Snowproof

64%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Nokian WR Snowproof

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

Nokian WR Snowproof

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

Nokian WR Snowproof

69%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

Nokian WR Snowproof

77%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Nokian WR Snowproof

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

Nokian WR Snowproof

89%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Nokian WR Snowproof

81%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Dry lane changing

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

70%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Dry steering response

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Nokian WR Snowproof

79%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Snow braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

49%

Nokian WR Snowproof

82%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Snow traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02

56%

Nokian WR Snowproof

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Snow handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

32%

Nokian WR Snowproof

80%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Lateral guidance on snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

Nokian WR Snowproof

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

Nokian WR Snowproof

85%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

50%

Nokian WR Snowproof

84%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

83%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian WR Snowproof

73%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Nokian WR Snowproof vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

EuroWinter HS02

WR Snowproof

Blizzak LM-005

Test Profile

Wet

Dry

Snow

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison