Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

PremiumContact 7

UltraContact NXT

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02

Powerproof 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Number of tests

4

2

3

1

5

Best position

#7

#6

#2

#1

Average position

12.3

8.0

3.7

3.3

1.0

2.2

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

98

91

34

40

64

63

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Nokian Powerproof 2

86%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Nokian Powerproof 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

85%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

Nokian Powerproof 2

42%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

78%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

86%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

79%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

Nokian Powerproof 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

82%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Nokian Powerproof 2

71%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

92%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

Nokian Powerproof 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

90%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

83%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Nokian Powerproof 2

84%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

84%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

96%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Nokian Powerproof 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. Goodyear Efficientgrip 2 SUV

EuroWinter HS02

Powerproof 2

e.Ziex

Efficientgrip Performance 2

ION Evo

Efficientgrip 2 SUV

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison