Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

Also compare with

SportContact 7

Ventus Evo

PremiumContact 7

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

P ZERO PZ4

Number of tests

4

1

3

14

Best position

#7

#3

#1

#2

Average position

12.3

12.0

1.0

3.3

3.7

5.5

Latest test

2025

2026

2025

Available sizes

98

111

64

40

34

706

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Michelin e.Primacy

61%

Hankook ION Evo

89%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

87%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

69%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

68%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

97%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

78%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

78%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

Michelin e.Primacy

65%

Hankook ION Evo

77%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

66%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

76%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

74%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

90%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

Michelin e.Primacy

52%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

61%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

89%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Michelin e.Primacy

74%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

Michelin e.Primacy

63%

Hankook ION Evo

91%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

80%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Michelin e.Primacy

80%

Hankook ION Evo

92%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

77%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

82%

Dry lane changing

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

93%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

85%

Dry steering response

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

85%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

88%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

84%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

Michelin e.Primacy

62%

Hankook ION Evo

72%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

70%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

75%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

Michelin e.Primacy

70%

Hankook ION Evo

66%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

67%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

77%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

81%

Michelin e.Primacy

54%

Hankook ION Evo

78%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

59%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

74%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

81%

Hankook ION Evo

71%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

83%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

52%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Michelin e.Primacy

100%

Hankook ION Evo

82%

GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2

99%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

49%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Michelin e.Primacy vs. Hankook ION Evo vs. GoodYear Efficientgrip Performance 2 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. Pirelli P ZERO PZ4

EuroWinter HS02

e.Primacy

ION Evo

Efficientgrip Performance 2

e.Ziex

P ZERO PZ4

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison