18 Shops · 56,847+ Products
THETYRELAB.COM

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+ vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Falken EuroWinter HS02Upper-middle
FalkenFalken

EuroWinter HS02

6.5
R14 – R21
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+Upper-middle
KumhoKumho

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7
R13 – R21
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005Premium
BridgestoneBridgestone

Blizzak LM-005

8.2
R14 – R22
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3Premium
GoodYearGoodYear

UltraGrip Performance 3

9.5
R14 – R22
Also compare with
PILOT ALPIN 5 WinterContact TS 870 UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Falken
EuroWinter HS02
Kumho
WinterCraft WP52+
Bridgestone
Blizzak LM-005
GoodYear
UltraGrip Performance 3
Number of tests
4
3
49
24
Best position
#7
#4
#1
#1
Average position
12.3
4.3
3.2
2.7
Latest test
2025
2025
2024
2025
Available sizes
98
97
213
302

Wet

Wet
Falken EuroWinter HS02
60%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
79%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
83%
Aquaplaning - cross
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
66%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
62%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
95%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Aquaplaning - longitudal
Falken EuroWinter HS02
75%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
74%
Wet handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
48%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
93%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
91%
Wet circle cornering
Falken EuroWinter HS02
63%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
90%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
86%

Snow

Snow
Falken EuroWinter HS02
43%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
81%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
75%
Snow traction
Falken EuroWinter HS02
56%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
76%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Snow braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
49%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
80%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
86%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Snow handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
32%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
86%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
72%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
62%
Lateral guidance on snow
Falken EuroWinter HS02
33%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
76%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
84%

Dry

Dry
Falken EuroWinter HS02
68%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
78%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%
Dry braking
Falken EuroWinter HS02
71%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
84%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
72%
Dry handling
Falken EuroWinter HS02
65%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
89%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
82%
Dry lane changing
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
80%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
77%
Dry steering response
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
84%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
79%

Comfort

Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02
76%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
81%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
85%
Exterior noise
Falken EuroWinter HS02
72%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
72%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
79%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
80%
Comfort
Falken EuroWinter HS02
50%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
68%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
82%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
73%

Costs

Costs
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
71%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
78%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
70%
Mileage
Falken EuroWinter HS02
67%
Kumho WinterCraft WP52+
69%
Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005
64%
GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3
56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Add to comparison

Popular brands
New comparison