Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

8.7

R13 – R21

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

WinterContact TS 870

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

Number of tests

4

49

3

Best position

#7

#1

#4

Average position

12.3

3.2

4.3

Latest test

2025

2024

2025

Available sizes

98

213

97

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

79%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

66%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

95%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

93%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

90%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

81%

Snow traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

76%

Snow braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

49%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

86%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

80%

Snow handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

32%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

72%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

86%

Lateral guidance on snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

76%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

78%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

84%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

89%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Dry steering response

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

84%

Dry lane changing

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

80%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

81%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

79%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

72%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

82%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

68%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

78%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

71%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005

64%

Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

69%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak LM-005 vs. Kumho WinterCraft WP52+

EuroWinter HS02

Blizzak LM-005

WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison