Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

Also compare with

PILOT ALPIN 5

SportContact 7

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

Number of tests

4

14

3

24

Best position

#7

#1

#2

#1

Average position

12.3

3.6

3.7

2.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

98

188

34

302

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Falken e.Ziex

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

83%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Falken e.Ziex

61%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

68%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

74%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

69%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

91%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Falken e.Ziex

77%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

86%

Wet side guide

Falken EuroWinter HS02

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

87%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

100%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

75%

Snow traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Snow braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

49%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Snow handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

32%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

62%

Lateral guidance on snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

98%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

84%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Falken e.Ziex

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Falken e.Ziex

88%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

72%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Falken e.Ziex

81%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

82%

Dry lane changing

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Falken e.Ziex

87%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

77%

Dry steering response

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Falken e.Ziex

73%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

79%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

85%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Falken e.Ziex

78%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

80%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

73%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Falken e.Ziex

80%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

70%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Falken e.Ziex

60%

GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

56%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Falken e.Ziex vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3 vs. GoodYear UltraGrip Performance 3

EuroWinter HS02

Blizzak 6

e.Ziex

UltraGrip Performance 3

UltraGrip Performance 3

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Add to comparison