Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

Upper-middle

Falken

EuroWinter HS02

VS

Blizzak 6

WinterContact TS 870

9.9

R14 – R18

Also compare with

UltraGrip Performance 3

UltraGrip Performance+

WinterCraft WP52+

Test Profile

EuroWinter HS02

Blizzak 6

WinterContact TS 870

Number of tests

4

14

17

Best position

#7

#1

Average position

12.3

3.6

1.7

Latest test

2025

Available sizes

98

188

80

Wet

Falken EuroWinter HS02

60%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

78%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Aquaplaning - cross

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

64%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

93%

Wet braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

62%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Aquaplaning - longitudal

Falken EuroWinter HS02

75%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Wet handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

48%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

92%

Wet circle cornering

Falken EuroWinter HS02

63%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

83%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

94%

Snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

43%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Snow traction

Falken EuroWinter HS02

56%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

87%

Snow braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

49%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

75%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Snow handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

32%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

84%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Lateral guidance on snow

Falken EuroWinter HS02

33%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

98%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

100%

Dry

Falken EuroWinter HS02

68%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

72%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

89%

Dry braking

Falken EuroWinter HS02

71%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

56%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Dry handling

Falken EuroWinter HS02

65%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

82%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

91%

Dry lane changing

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

92%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

95%

Dry steering response

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

74%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

76%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

81%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

90%

Exterior noise

Falken EuroWinter HS02

72%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

66%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

86%

Comfort

Falken EuroWinter HS02

50%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

79%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

85%

Costs

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

68%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

84%

Mileage

Falken EuroWinter HS02

67%

Bridgestone Blizzak 6

28%

Continental WinterContact TS 870

83%

Dimensions and prices

Compare prices across all available dimensions for these tyres.

Mutual tests

Organization	Season	Year	Dimension
AUTOBILD	Winter	2024	205/55 R16	View

Comparison: Falken EuroWinter HS02 vs. Bridgestone Blizzak 6 vs. Continental WinterContact TS 870

EuroWinter HS02

Blizzak 6

WinterContact TS 870

Test Profile

Wet

Snow

Dry

Comfort

Costs

Dimensions and prices

Mutual tests

Add to comparison